Chapter 1 Introduction
Intellectual property law courses are offered in the second and third years of law school. Students interested in pursuing intellectual property will often focus their studies on patent law or in the areas of copyright, trademark, and trade secrets.
Those students studying to become a patent lawyer must have as a prerequisite a background of scientific training. Normally,the student will possess a Bachelors of Science from an undergraduate university in chemistry, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, or biotechnology. Patent lawyers are highly sought after in the United States, because of the ever growing field of technology and ingenuity. Patent lawyers can also practice copyright, trademark , and trade secret law, but in the larger cities where it is possible to specialize most prefer to specialize in patent law.
A lawyer who wants to become a copyright, trademark, or trade secret attorney can have any type of undergraduate (pre- law) training. The student’s only prerequisite is to pass the bar exam after law school. To practice before the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office,however,a person must also take and pass a special parent bar exam. In larger cities in the Unites States,it is common for copyright, trademark, and trade secrets lawyers to practice only on those areas while lawyers who practice patent law often work only in the field of patent law.
Intellectual property law is the law that protects creations of human intellect. It is divided into four areas of law which include:: (i) patent law; (ii) copyright law; (iii) trademark law; and (iv) trade secret law. Federal law governs patents, copyright, trademarks and some unfair competition causes of action. Other unfair competition causes of action,trade secrets,the right of publicity and idea law are the product of state common law and statutes. In some countries, this area of law is known as" industrial property" rather than intellectual property.
While each of the intellectual property doctrines is distinct, they all have characteristics in common. Each provides limited property rights in intangible products of investment, intellect and/or labor, whether they be inventive ideas, accumulations of information, original means of expression,business good will or the"persona" of a celebrity. Moreover,as discussed below,each
doctrine has been shaped by much the same set of critical public policy concerns.
The primary purpose of intellectual property law is to ensure a rich, diverse and competitive marketplace. To achieve this purpose, intellectual property doctrines all provide property rights as incentives to individual who creates new products, services or works of art or literature. Property rights in the fruits of creativity increase the chances that profit from his work. By making creative endeavors financially feasible and potentially rewarding to large numbers of people, intellectual property laws facilitate provision of a variety of creative products and services to public.
In addition to economic incentives,however,a competitive market - place requires free access to innovation: Competitors need the freest possible use of others’ intellectual creations in order to copy and improve on them. Requiring competitors to" re - invent the wheel" is highly inefficient. The ability to copy results in still greater variety and lower prices in the marketplace. Moreover, since the general public is meant to be the ultimate beneficiary of this bounty of products and services, it is important that the general public have as much access to the products of creativity as possible.
Obviously, the goals of giving creators property rights in their works and ensuring that competitors and the public have free use of those works can conflict. Each intellectual property doctrine seeks to achieve the optional balance between provision of private property rights and retention of public access to the products of creativity, in order to enhance the competitive marketplace to the fullest possible extent. Each intellectual property doctrine grants property rights to provide the greatest public access possible without undermining that incentive.